Tourists are a guest, who enjoy the local culture, custom to guest mentality self-effacing understanding. Management department concerned should make great efforts to improve the service quality and resolutely combat tourism fraud infringe upon tourists rights behavior
Since entering in February, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macao ensued mainland tourists with local tour guide disputes, and three incidents are fighting behavior, moved the local police law organ. These disputes the ins and outs of local police, courts and prosecutors have or will give ica, but the dovetailing happened, not as bad examples influence "it takes two to tango" have been ignored. Citizens outbound tourist destination occurred three successive similar unhappy incident, worth ponder the parties.
Resident travel especially outbound, is the development of economy and society in the process of achievement, tourism manners should reflect modern civilization. No matter to guide, pick service how discontent, even back 10,000 steps speak because covet petty gain on the "zero cost" "negative membership fee" when, even accidentally met "black guide" and "evil guiding", tourists shall, through the legal channels and program right maintenance, can complain, can call the police, or according to the competent department of tourism of repeated hints, from collect invoice to use mobile phones photos, sound recording, video recording, etc, to "preserve evidence, afterwards accounts" purpose, can never buy legal system to disregard, make bullheadedness pounces, play, a bidding war, our journey into the "fisticuffs." Facts have shown that the fist to rights, can backfire. Logically, move fist of that a moment, the parties have put themselves in illegal and unreasonable situation, and how to talk about rights?
Tourism is a kind of consumer behavior, involving supply chain aspect. Especially in our country tourism explosive growth, existing national unbalanced supply and demand, quality is not high, tourism service level for further improvement. As our country exit tour important destination, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions faced the large mainland passenger flow remains the same, supplies and services bottleneck. These questions are objective existence, need to coordinate departments concerned increase efforts, also need to tourists and their followers had to understand each other, in tolerance of win-win cooperation. Tourists are a guest, who enjoy the local culture, custom to guest mentality self-effacing understanding. Management department concerned should make great efforts to improve the service quality and resolutely combat tourism fraud infringe upon tourists rights behavior.
Showing posts with label rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rights. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Thursday, February 10, 2011
some legal experts believed that
Beijing normal university professor criminal legal science research institute WangZhiXiang think, the law does not exclude organizers their own babies become what the organizers of possibilities. "If is violence, coercion means organizing their children to beg, may establish crimce." But WangZhiXiang also think, the so-called "organization", are generally organizers of the number should meet more people (3 people above), so common situation is organizing their children and other children together by begging.
No violence stress children begging? Have case-handling prosecutors felt in judicial practice, child knows the discerning weaker, when receiving the outlaws of abetting, induce, more of the time is powerless against. Second, at present outlaws control manipulation of disabled children from the guardian of disabled persons, children's hands rented or with acrobatic performance etc. Reason to cheat Actor need not "violence, coercion" means, can easily control over them. In addition, poor families use their parents or relatives children go begging con, more do not need "violence, coercion" means.
To this, the law should be clearly, whether violence, nonviolence, bringing children out beg, calculate crime.
Beg rights should not be interference?
However, for zhuhai happen "oolong save", some Internet also thinks, begging is one of the basic rights, and strangers shall not be entitled to gossiping.
Yesterday, a call "MaRi pull" net friend thinks, in network instigation, beg child was DNA, is a waste of public resources. Netizens to respond and say: "let minors to beg for he would psychosomatic damage? Biological parents can let their kids hurt? Are there any more than children don't hurt more important?" Also netizens to think, the children were hundreds of police search to and then taken to a hospital and their father DNA, "you think this child experiencing so horrible scene, in the future there will be no shadow"?
Actually, even in guangzhou street, there are poor, parents because of sickness poor children and other reasons, the streets to beg. These people face life stress, think only depend on oneself ability, help dint solve society.
Beijing normal university professor criminal legal science research institute WangZhiXiang thinks, begging is a complex social problems, even in rich countries are inevitably exists. Therefore although China do not encourage beg, but not banned begging and organizational begging. Sometimes, to those living unsettled and lack of living means of the disabled and children speaking, they may still beg organization to help them method, therefore should not be banned, let alone into sin. In his view, organize begging behavior does not in itself must have social harmfulness.
No violence stress children begging? Have case-handling prosecutors felt in judicial practice, child knows the discerning weaker, when receiving the outlaws of abetting, induce, more of the time is powerless against. Second, at present outlaws control manipulation of disabled children from the guardian of disabled persons, children's hands rented or with acrobatic performance etc. Reason to cheat Actor need not "violence, coercion" means, can easily control over them. In addition, poor families use their parents or relatives children go begging con, more do not need "violence, coercion" means.
To this, the law should be clearly, whether violence, nonviolence, bringing children out beg, calculate crime.
Beg rights should not be interference?
However, for zhuhai happen "oolong save", some Internet also thinks, begging is one of the basic rights, and strangers shall not be entitled to gossiping.
Yesterday, a call "MaRi pull" net friend thinks, in network instigation, beg child was DNA, is a waste of public resources. Netizens to respond and say: "let minors to beg for he would psychosomatic damage? Biological parents can let their kids hurt? Are there any more than children don't hurt more important?" Also netizens to think, the children were hundreds of police search to and then taken to a hospital and their father DNA, "you think this child experiencing so horrible scene, in the future there will be no shadow"?
Actually, even in guangzhou street, there are poor, parents because of sickness poor children and other reasons, the streets to beg. These people face life stress, think only depend on oneself ability, help dint solve society.
Beijing normal university professor criminal legal science research institute WangZhiXiang thinks, begging is a complex social problems, even in rich countries are inevitably exists. Therefore although China do not encourage beg, but not banned begging and organizational begging. Sometimes, to those living unsettled and lack of living means of the disabled and children speaking, they may still beg organization to help them method, therefore should not be banned, let alone into sin. In his view, organize begging behavior does not in itself must have social harmfulness.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)